Waferpedia

Koh Young

2014-09-11T12

Assembly / SMTKoh Young 2014-09-11T12 family
Research Quality: 40% complete

Provisional entry — research in progress

This page was generated automatically from cited public sources and hasn't completed the full research pass yet. Every specification shown carries its source; more detail is added as research completes.

2014-09-11T12 — web.archive.org
Fig. 012014-09-11T12web.archive.org[1]

What it is

General reference — not yet source-verified

Koh Young is a manufacturer of inspection equipment for the surface-mount technology (SMT) assembly process. The company produces three-dimensional solder paste inspection (SPI) systems and three-dimensional automated optical inspection (AOI) systems.

How it works

General reference — not yet source-verified

Koh Young inspection machines use a three-dimensional measurement technique to inspect solder paste deposits and component placements. The systems project a structured light pattern onto the board and capture images from multiple angles to reconstruct height information.

The inspection process compares the measured three-dimensional data against predefined acceptance criteria to detect defects such as insufficient solder, bridging, or misalignment.

Where it fits in the process flow

General reference — not yet source-verified

In an SMT assembly line, the solder paste inspection system is positioned immediately after the solder paste printing step to verify paste volume, height, and shape before component placement. The automated optical inspection system can be used after component placement to check for missing or misaligned components, or after reflow soldering to verify final solder joint quality.

Applications

General reference — not yet source-verified

Koh Young SPI and AOI systems are used in the assembly of printed circuit boards for industries including consumer electronics, automotive, medical devices, and telecommunications.

The machines inspect solder paste deposits, component presence and orientation, and solder joint quality on populated boards.

What do the numbers mean?

Configuration & options1

Semiconductor Solutions
Listed as one of the company’s business areas[2]
Accurate?
Interested in this tool?
Need help with this tool?Embed spec card

Where are the manuals?

Generated from public-source data on file. Enter your email to access — nothing is published; details are routed privately.

Not publicly documented

Field notes

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Worked with this tool? Help preserve its knowledge →

Frequently asked questions

Is operator training required to use such a system?General reference — not yet source-verified

Yes, operators typically require training on system setup, programming inspection recipes, interpreting results, and performing basic maintenance. However, the user interface is designed to be intuitive for experienced SMT personnel.

Can the inspection data be integrated into a factory's quality management system?General reference — not yet source-verified

Most systems in this class offer connectivity options such as network export of inspection data, statistical process control charts, and traceability features that allow integration with broader manufacturing execution systems.

What is the typical false call rate for such automated inspection systems?General reference — not yet source-verified

False call rates vary by application and programming quality, but well-tuned systems aim to keep false positives low to avoid unnecessary manual rechecking. Advanced algorithms and learning capabilities help reduce false calls over time.

Not publicly documented

The following facts about the 2014-09-11T12 are absent from this record as of this revision. First-hand knowledge or a citation closes a gap; every submission is reviewed before publication.

  • Fewer than 3 independently cited specifications for the 2014-09-11T12 are on record; the remainder await public documentation.

    Answerable by: an OEM datasheet, a cleanroom equipment inventory, or an engineer who operated or installed it

  • No publicly documented production dates or lifecycle milestones (introduction, end of production, EOL) for the 2014-09-11T12 are on record.

    Answerable by: OEM historical records or a trade-press announcement

  • No publicly documented variants, configuration options, or revision breakpoints of the 2014-09-11T12 are on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM product catalog or an engineer who ordered or specified the tool

  • The control-system platform and OS era of the 2014-09-11T12 are not on record.

    Answerable by: an engineer who operated it or OEM installation records

  • No publicly documented failure modes or field errata for the 2014-09-11T12 are on record.

    Answerable by: a field service engineer, process engineer, or maintenance technician

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Sources & citations

Sources (3)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]web.archive.org — web.archive.orgweb.archive.org
  2. [2]web.archive.org — web.archive.orgweb.archive.org
  3. [3]web.archive.org — web.archive.orgweb.archive.org
Was this page accurate?

Last updated Oct 5, 2026.

Compare with similar tools

View all →